Observational studyJournal of cataract and refractive surgery2026
Tolerance to intraocular lens decentration and tilt in five presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: SS-AS-OCT-based study.
Observational study in Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the impact of intraocular lens (IOL) decentration and tilt on the visual performance of 5 presbyopia-correcting IOLs in patients after cataract surgery.
settingZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China.
designProspective, observational study.
methodsPatients with cataract undergoing uneventful phacoemulsification with extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOLs (Vivity, ZXR00) and full range-of-field (RoF) IOLs (ZMB00, TFNT00, ZFR00V) were enrolled. Each IOL group was stratified by the third quartile (Q3) of IOL tilt and decentration measured by CASIA2. Intraocular higher-order aberrations (HOAs), contrast sensitivity (CS), modulation transfer function (MTF), Strehl ratio, and patient-reported outcomes 3 months postoperatively were compared between subgroups.
results260 patients (260 eyes) were included. Based on the Q3 values, eyes were categorized into tilt subgroups T1 (<5.63 degrees) and T2 (≥5.63 degrees), and decentration subgroups D1 (<0.24 mm) and D2 (≥0.24 mm). No significant differences in visual quality were observed between Vivity and ZXR00 subgroups. By contrast, T2 subgroups of TFNT00, ZMB00, and ZFR00V exhibited higher HOAs and coma, and lower CS, than their T1 subgroups (all P < .05). The D2 subgroup of ZFR00V showed increased HOAs and coma, and reduced CS under photopic and mesopic conditions with glare (all P < .05). The D2 subgroup of ZMB00 demonstrated higher HOAs and coma, as well as lower MTF (all P < .05). The D2 subgroup of TFNT00 reported significantly lower patient satisfaction (3.25 ± 0.46 vs 3.83 ± 0.38, P = .008).
conclusionsEDOF IOLs (ZXR00 and Vivity) demonstrated greater tolerance to tilt and decentration compared with FULL-RoF IOLs (ZMB00, TFNT00, and ZFR00V).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.