ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Implementation and evaluation of a multidisciplinary training course in waiting list management.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo implement and evaluate satisfaction and knowledge retention in a multidisciplinary training course on waiting list management.
methodThis methodological study involved two phases of the ADDIE instructional design model. The course was delivered through a virtual learning environment (VLE) between October 2023 and June 2024. Data were collected using questionnaires and VLE-generated reports and were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon test (p<0.05).
resultsA total of 768 healthcare professionals enrolled in the course; 429 (55.9%) accessed the VLE, and 255 (59.4%) completed the course. Course evaluation showed high satisfaction levels with the presentation, content, and applicability to professional practice. The analysis revealed significant participant knowledge retention (z = -8.09, p < 0.001).
conclusionThe findings demonstrate the course's positive impact on participant training, as reflected in the high satisfaction ratings and significant knowledge retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.