ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Construction and validation of an evaluation instrument for the care pathway of people with syphilis.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto construct and validate the content of an evaluation instrument for the Care Pathway of people with syphilis.
methodsthis methodological study was conducted in four stages: 1) theoretical framework through a scoping review; 2) construction of the instrument; 3) content validation using the Delphi technique; and 4) finalization of the instrument. Data analysis was performed using the Item-Level Content Validity Index, reliability applied to domains, instrument-level content validity, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient.
resultsthe validation of the instrument involved item assessment through two rounds of the Delphi technique. The final version of the instrument consisted of 58 questions distributed across two dimensions: macropolitics and micropolitics of health care. Each item achieved a validity index of 1.00.
conclusionsthe instrument demonstrated content validity and reliability, contributing to improvements in health services, enhanced integration among professionals, and reduced syphilis transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.