ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Instrumento para Avaliação Formativa em Estágio Supervisionado de Enfermagem®: elaboration and validity.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto develop and validate the Instrumento para Avaliação Formativa de Estudantes de Enfermagem em Estágio Curricular Supervisionado® content.
methodsa methodological study, carried out in two rounds using the modified e-Delphi technique. Its development was supported by an integrative literature review, official documents from the Ministry of Education, Federal Nursing Council, Brazilian Nursing Association and theoretical framework by Philippe Perrenoud.
resultsin the first round, the instrument presented a Content Validity Index of 0.89, while in the second round, of 0.92. Reliability was 0.993. The instrument presents identification information, usage guidelines, four domains, 27 items, descriptive assessment by professors and supervisors, and student self-assessment.
conclusionsthe instrument is a valid tool, allowing formative assessment. Its use, based on the guidelines established and based on the theoretical framework, encourages the procedural and regulatory assessment of student learning in supervised curricular internship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.