Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41370408›Full record

ReviewBrazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery2026

Great Saphenous Vein Lumen: Intimal Openings.

Andrzej Loesch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrzej LoeschUniversity College London Centre for Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases Research Department of Inflammation and Rare Diseases London United Kingdom Centre for Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases, Research Department of Inflammation and Rare Diseases, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review discusses the morphological characteristics of the human great saphenous vein (SV) harvested for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). It focuses on the vein's luminal intima, which was examined using laser confocal microscopy (LCM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Summarised findings are: (1) LCM observations revealed that the vessel-like profiles, formed by the intima of the peripheral parts of SV luminal folds, may create a false impression that these are vasa vasorum vessels terminating at the vein lumen. (2) The SV luminal intima displays openings ranging from about 5 μm to 20 μm. Among these, larger openings (> 10 µm) are recognized as openings of small tributary branches rather than vasa vasorum vessels donating to SV lumen. It is suggested that these vessel openings are involved in the retrograde blood flow into the SV graft wall after CABG. In contrast, openings < 10 µm, or even those < 5 µm, did not show obvious vascular characteristics, suggesting these structures might have another physiological function. (3) In addition to the abovementioned openings, narrow, elongated intimal openings approximately 3 μm by 30 μm in size can be seen at the SEM level; these likely represent the entrances to the small folds detected by TEM in the inner media of the SV. Communication between the SV lumen and the vein vasa vasorum seems crucial for the anti-ischaemic protection of the vein as coronary graft. This issue, including the role of intimal openings, may require further investigation.

Indexed as

Saphenous VeinTunica IntimaCoronary Artery BypassHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionVasa VasorumCoronary Artery Bypass.Saphenous VeinVasa Vasorum

Identifiers

PMID41370408
PMCPMC12700025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.