ArticleClinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)2026
Adoption and Integration of "Complete Anatomy" in Early-Year Medical Education: Student and Staff Perspectives.
Article in Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital anatomy platforms are used in undergraduate healthcare education, but their integration into early curricula varies and often lacks alignment with instructional design. This study evaluates the implementation of Complete Anatomy, a three-dimensional anatomy platform, within an early-year medical curriculum. A mixed-methods design was used to collect student and staff data through surveys and focus groups. Student responses showed selective use focused on visualization tools, with limited engagement with quizzes and annotation features. Staff reported low familiarity and minimal use in teaching. Reported barriers included technical instability, navigation difficulty, and lack of integration with learning outcomes. Students and staff proposed curriculum actions to support platform use, including onboarding during induction, guided tasks in tutorials, tutor modeling, and alignment with block content. These actions respond to operational constraints and support structured adoption. The findings provide a framework for platform-specific implementation that may improve consistency of use and reduce cognitive burden. This approach supports integration of digital anatomy tools into early medical education and may inform institutional strategies for resource adoption across disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.