ArticlePloS one2025
Under renovation: Large-scale societal events induce shifts between moral ideologies.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing research has revealed various cross-sectional inter-personal/group (e.g., regional) differences in moral traits; it has, however, paid less attention to cross-temporal intra-personal/group moral differences - simply, changes over time. Addressing the intellectual gap, the present research proposes that morality is redefined - renovated - in times when a society undergoes widespread social upheavals, in a manner that the incoming new ideology would better serve the society. Using longitudinal social media (Reddit) text data (N = 459,077,063) from Reddit over the 63 months since the last global great recession starting in late 2007, we report a partial, economy-focused demonstration of the hypothesis, wherein people associated their overall conception of morality more with support for authority and hierarchy and less with fairness and equality when the economic stress was increasing. In comparison, the public reversed the association to lean back on fairness and away from authority when the market was on the rise. Together, the findings offer insights into the communal nature of morality and call for caution that personal moral disposition may be malleable and fluctuating with the collective surroundings, thus cannot be adequately measured without first considering what the disposition means for the cultural-social unity at the moment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.