ArticlePloS one2025
Association of cognitive reserve with 9-year domain-specific cognitive trajectories and risk of cognitive impairment in Mexican older adults.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why some minds bend, not break: an exploratory study of cognitive and psychological performance across levels of cognitive reserve in subjective cognitive decline.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Cognitive-motor network integration as a behavioral marker of cognitive reserve in post-stroke rehabilitation.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive reserve (CR) refers to the adaptation of cognitive performance to endure brain pathology or the aging process. CR can be categorized into static (education and occupation) or dynamic (leisure and physical activities) proxies. Typically, longitudinal studies assess CR as a composite score at baseline and cognitive performance as a global score. This study aimed to compare the relationship between different CR proxies (static and dynamic) with 9-year domain-specific cognitive trajectories, and the risk of cognitive impairment in older adults. Data from the latest four waves of the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS; n = 3102, baseline mean age = 66.62 years) were used. Mixed effects models were performed with CR as independent variables and cognitive trajectories (verbal memory encoding and retrieval, verbal fluency, constructional praxis, visual attention, and memory) as outcomes. Education and leisure activities were significant positive predictors of all cognitive domains. Physical activities were a positive predictor of verbal fluency and verbal memory encoding only. Occupation was a positive predictor of verbal fluency and visual attention. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between CR and the risk of cognitive impairment, where education (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.83), occupational complexity (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.95), and leisure activities (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.95, 0.97) were significant protective factors. Increasing the years of education can serve as a preventive strategy to delay the clinical manifestation of cognitive impairment while implementing leisure activities can act as an intervention to promote cognition even in later years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.