ArticlePLOS global public health2025
'We cannot just keep it in our palm': A policy analysis of the integration of the case management of neglected tropical diseases into the health system of Liberia.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the development and implementation of Liberia's policy to integrate the case management of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) into the broader health system. The policy responded to persistent challenges of inequitable access and fragmented services, as outlined in Liberia's 2016 national strategic plan for integrated NTD case management. Using a qualitative case study approach, the research draws on stakeholder perspectives to explore how integration was pursued and how policy was translated into practice. Guided by the Policy Analysis Triangle, this study examines the dynamics shaping policy development and translation. Triangulation of interview, document, and observational data informed the development of a conceptual framework identifying five interrelated domains-people, place, process, politics, and power-as central to the translation of health policy into practice. These domains were grounded in Liberia's experience but reflect themes widely discussed in global health policy literature. The resulting framework provides a valuable lens for navigating the complexities of health policy development and translation, particularly for disease programme integration across key health system functions. While anchored in the NTD context in Liberia, the consistency of these themes across diverse settings reinforces the broader relevance and utility of the framework. With appropriate contextual adaptation, it offers practical guidance for policy-makers and implementers working to develop and translate complex health policies into effective and equitable practices. The findings contribute to global health systems thinking by underscoring the need for a shift from narrow, clinically focused policies towards more holistic, inclusive, and system-oriented approaches that reflect real-world complexity and engage diverse stakeholders.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.