ArticlePloS one2025
Improved predictive formulae for wave overtopping at sloped breakwaters using interpretable machine learning models.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of mean wave overtopping discharge is essential for the safe and cost-effective design of coastal defence structures. While traditional empirical, physical, and numerical models remain important, Machine Learning (ML) has recently emerged as a powerful complementary tool. This study presents a ML-based framework to predict mean wave overtopping discharge at sloped breakwaters, with a focus on both predictive accuracy and model interpretability, supported by a series of structured pre- and post-processing steps. Five ML algorithms were evaluated: two decision tree-based models, i.e., Random Forest (RF) and Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDT), and three kernel-based models, i.e., Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). The models were trained and validated using the EurOtop (2018) dataset on sloped breakwaters. Among them, GPR yielded the best predictive performance, achieving an R² of 0.80 and the lowest RMSE, MAE, and RAE values (0.100, 0.013, and 0.30, respectively), indicating a strong agreement with observed data. Feature importance analysis revealed that Relative Freeboard and Freeboard Deficit (FD) were the most influential parameters across the models. To enhance interpretability and practical usability, we translated the ML findings into mathematical expressions using polynomial regression and Genetic Programming (GP). A new set of simplified equations was developed to estimate mean overtopping discharge (q) based solely on FD, effectively modelling the relationship between FD and ln(q) within the EurOtop dataset. The proposed formulae provide coastal engineers with a rapid, interpretable, and reliable tool for estimating mean wave overtopping, significantly enhancing design efficiency and decision-making under uncertainty. By bridging the gap between advanced data-driven techniques and practical engineering needs, this work advances the integration of ML into coastal infrastructure design and supports the development of more adaptive and climate-resilient defence systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.