ArticlePloS one2025
Explainable AI for sign language recognition models: Integrating Grad-Cam LIME and Integrated Gradients.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sign language recognition is crucial in bridging the communication gaps between hearing and deaf communities. In this study, we build on an existing sign language classification model based on the VGG19 architecture, enhancing its robustness through dataset augmentation and alternative data representations. We introduce a segmentation-based approach that utilizes hand masks generated by the U-Net model, replacing depth images to mitigate noise and improve classification accuracy. We use an Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approach that incorporates Grad-CAM, LIME, and integrated gradients methods to interpret the model's decision-making process, ensuring transparency and reliability in real-world applications. Our comparative analysis between Red-Green-Blue (RGB) and mask-based models demonstrates that while the RGB model benefits from richer texture and color information, the mask-based model effectively focuses on hand shape and structure. The integration of XAI further validates our results by highlighting key regions of the image that influence the model's predictions and by enabling a multi-perspective analysis that captures complementary aspects of the input, including region-based attention, pixel-level attribution, and structural shape analysis, thereby facilitating a deeper understanding of the model's internal representations and potential failure modes. This work contributes to advancing American Sign Language recognition by improving model generalisation and explainability, ultimately fostering greater trust and usability in assistive technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.