ArticlePloS one2025
Online propagation of emotions: A study of resharing dynamics on social media following celebrity suicides.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotional contagion on social media, particularly following shocking and tragic events, often unfolds through widespread resharing, amplifying affective responses that are typically intense and negative. This study focuses on the context of celebrity suicides, which have the potential to trigger emotional contagion and lead to adverse behavioral outcomes, such as copycat suicides. Using an exhaustive Twitter dataset covering four celebrity suicides, we theorize the propagation of emotional content through a valence-arousal framework, distinguishing emotions based on affective valence (positive or negative) and physiological arousal (high or low). We analyze how distinct emotions embedded in tweets propagate through retweet cascades, treating each tweet and its retweets as a single cascade. Propagation is measured across four cascade dimensions: size, lifetime, speed, and burstiness. Emotions are extracted from over a million tweets and retweets using a BERT-based language model and are used as predictors in regression analyses of the propagation metrics. Our results show that emotional messages propagate in distinct ways after tragic events. Disgust emerges as the most contagious emotion, spreading quickly, widely, and with longevity, while fear, despite its arousal, spreads weakly. Anger and surprise generate fast but short-lived cascades marked by high burstiness. Joy, though less frequent, endures longer than neutral and negative content, reflecting resilience but with lower burstiness. These findings advance research on online emotional propagation by demonstrating that discrete emotions differ significantly even within the same valence-arousal characteristic. They also offer insights for public health strategies to mitigate risks linked to emotional amplification in digital environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.