Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41370279›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Development of machine learning models for prediction of current and future dementia.

Wonseok Jeong, Wankyo Chung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wonseok JeongDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3172-9905
Wankyo ChungDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8094-2433

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia is among the most distressing and burdensome health challenges in aging populations. Treatment efficacy is limited; however, early diagnosis can delay or prevent disease progression. Previous machine learning-based prediction models have limitations (e.g., they are based on clinical parameters or are not generalizable). Thus, in this study, prediction models were developed for current and future dementia solely based on demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related features. Demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related variables collected from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Ageing (KLoSA) were used to develop machine learning-based prediction models for current and future dementia with various algorithms. Two sampling strategies were used for feature selection, one based on domain knowledge and the other based on statistical testing. Hyperparameter tuning was performed using grid search with cross-validation on the training set, and model evaluation was conducted on a separate test set. In the initial no-follow-up dataset, 92 of 6,898 participants exhibited dementia. Among 6,207 participants without dementia initially, 69 developed dementia within 2 years. Linear support vector machine (SVM) and radial bias function SVM exhibited the best sensitivity for current and future dementia (79.4% and 77.7%, respectively). The SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) approach improved the transparency of the model by highlighting the top ten features most strongly associated with increased dementia risk. We achieved reasonably accurate prediction results for dementia using only non-clinical features.

Indexed as

DementiaMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID41370279
PMCPMC12694792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.