ArticlePloS one2025
Understanding the menstrual health self-care practices and experiences among women with physical disabilities in rural Nepal: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen with disabilities often face significant challenges in promoting and practicing menstrual health, which compromises their quality of life and overall well-being. Limited studies have been conducted on women with physical disabilities and their self-care practices related to menstrual health in rural Nepal. Thus, this study aims to explore the differential experience and self-care practices for menstrual health among married women with physical disabilities in Karnali Province of Nepal.
methodsThe study used an exploratory qualitative method utilizing purposive sampling. Data collection was conducted through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, in which 31 married women with disabilities participated. A thematic analysis approach was employed, in which codes were generated inductively and organized into sub-themes, then consolidated into themes, which were subsequently presented as the findings supported by excerpts.
resultThe majority of the participants relied on gut feelings, and bodily symptoms such as head itches, mood swings, an increase in body temperature, home remedies for period cramps, and self-examination of the colour, odour, and consistency of menstrual blood for self-management. Participants self-tested for pregnancy in case of missed period while self-monitoring their blood pressure and menstrual blood for health diagnosis. The participants had misconceptions such as passing on disability to their fetus due to pain-management medication, practiced seclusion, avoided consumption of dairy products, fruits, and foods, and had limited knowledge, access, and misinformation regarding menstrual products beyond cotton clothes and menstrual pads, which suggests low self-awareness regarding menstrual health management.
conclusionAccess to disability-inclusive menstrual health information through optimal utilization of digital platforms and community sensitization events, knowledge and access to diverse menstrual product choices, mobilization of community volunteers for social and behaviour change initiatives, and the self-care inclusive health policies promoting social protection and menstrual health self-care provisions are key for decreased sexual and reproductive morbidity, and improved quality of life among women living with disability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.