ArticlePlant physiology2026
Developmental regulators enable rapid and efficient soybean transformation and CRISPR-mediated genome editing.
Article in Plant physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant Regeneration: Influencing Factors, Regulatory Networks, and Epigenetic Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- AI-Guided DNA-Free and Genotype-Independent Genome Editing for Soybean Improvement.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Breakthroughs in soybean transformation.Plant physiology · 2026Article
- CRISPR/Cas9 in soybean research: a measured leap toward genetic refinement.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
- Genomic and biochemical comparison of allelic triple-mutant lines derived from conventional breeding and multiplex gene editing.The plant genome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soybean (Glycine max) transformation remains challenging and has not kept pace with rapid advances in genetic engineering technologies due to low efficiency, lengthy timelines, and genotype dependency. Here, we developed a streamlined transformation method by leveraging developmental regulators (DRs) to promote de novo shoot regeneration directly from growing soybean plants. By evaluating multiple DR combinations, our results showed that co-expression of WUSCHEL2 (WUS2) and the gene encoding isopentenyltransferase (IPT) achieved higher transformation efficiencies (14.6% to 22.3%) in Williams 82 and Bert varieties than individual DRs without requiring exogenous hormones or selection agents. Moreover, this method produced heritable transgenic events within 9 to 11 weeks and successfully delivered CRISPR-Cas9 components, generating heritable mutations with 20% efficiency. The temporal transcriptomic and gene regulatory network analyses revealed that WUS2/IPT synergistically modulates stress responses and activates developmental pathways, orchestrating a transition from initial stress adaptation to regenerative programming. Our findings demonstrate that this DR-enabled approach significantly enhances soybean transformation frequency, reduces tissue culture requirements, and offers a promising genome-editing platform for soybean improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.