ArticlePloS one2025
Dog ownership enhances anchored personal relationships and sense of community: A comparison with incidental interactions and friendships.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Social and biological pathways linking relationships with companion animals to human well-being.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dogs are known to be catalysts for human-human relationships. However, there is insufficient quantitative research that directly compares dog owners' human-human relationships with those of non-owners. This study focused on whether dog owners are more likely to have human-human relationships and engage in social interactions within their neighborhoods. A previous model considered incidental interactions-which occur spontaneously between passersby in public settings-and friendships, as human-human relationships fostered by dog ownership. This study also considered anchored personal relationships, which are the types of relationships that dog owners would typically cultivate within their neighborhoods. Anchored personal relationships are relationships highly embedded within a social context and exist solely in a shared time, place, and activity. This study examined the associations between dog ownership and incidental interactions, friendships, and anchored personal relationships. We also examined the potential mediating effects of these relationships on the association between dog ownership and a sense of community. Analyzed data included 377 participants from a social survey conducted in a suburb of the Tokyo metropolitan area. We used generalized structural equation modeling to examine indirect effects. The findings revealed a positive correlation between dog ownership and having anchored personal relationships, as well as between dog ownership and having incidental interactions. However, after controlling for demographics, dog ownership did not increase the likelihood of having friends in one's neighborhood. All types of relationships were positively correlated with a stronger sense of community. However, only anchored personal relationships mediated the effect of dog ownership on sense of community. These findings support the proposition that anchored personal relationships should be considered alongside incidental interactions and friendships when studying human-human relationships fostered by dog ownership. Furthermore, exploratory analyses revealed that ownership of cats and other pets were not correlated with the relationships or a stronger sense of community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.