ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Designing modular genetic sensors with TtgR/AcrR family transcriptional regulators by using a statistical and data-driven approach.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Domain-Swapped LuxR-Type Quorum Sensing Receptors Reveal Divergent Ligand-Response Mechanisms among Homologues.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Engineered probiotics block arsenite absorption in the gastrointestinal tract.Trends in biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Module swapping is an emerging strategy for creating transcriptional regulators with tailored combinations of signal detection and promoter recognition. By hybridizing DNA-binding modules (DBMs) and ligand-binding modules (LBMs) from the same protein family, resulting regulators can be harnessed to establish new genetic connections. This approach has been applied to a range of regulator families; however, a portion of resulting hybrid regulators are poorly functional, which can be due to incompatibility between DBMs and LBMs, as critical module-module interactions are lost after hybridization. To address this issue, we developed an approach to design modular regulators and applied it to the TtgR/AcrR regulator family. Our approach involves identifying key residue pairs for DBM-LBM interactions by statistical analyses of coevolutionary traits among family members and experimental results from hybrid regulator characterization. These residue pairs were harnessed to develop a computational model for predicting compatibility between DBMs and LBMs. Using this predictive model, we designed mutations to reinstall critical interactions, which rescued protein activities. These hybrid regulators were harnessed to construct a genetic circuit for a three-input logic AND operation, demonstrating that our approach is effective for studying and designing new TtgR/AcrR modular regulators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.