Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41370178›Full record

Observational studyeLife2025

The impact of different antimicrobial exposures on the gut microbiome in the ARMORD observational study.

Leon Peto, Nicola Fawcett, Musaiwale M Kamfose, Claire Scarborough, Andy Peniket, Robert Danby, Timothy E A Peto, Derrick W Crook, Martin J Llewelyn, Ann Sarah Walker

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Leon PetoOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4100-2163
Nicola FawcettOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Musaiwale M KamfoseOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Claire ScarboroughOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Andy PeniketOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Robert DanbyOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Timothy E A PetoOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Derrick W CrookOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0590-2850
Martin J Llewelyn *Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, United Kingdom.
Ann Sarah Walker *Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0412-8509

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR200915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Better metrics to compare the impact of different antimicrobials on the gut microbiome would aid efforts to control antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The Antibiotic Resistance in the Microbiome - Oxford (ARMORD) study recruited inpatients, outpatients, and healthy volunteers in Oxfordshire, UK, who provided stool samples for metagenomic sequencing. Data on previous antimicrobial use and potential confounders were recorded. Exposures to each antimicrobial were considered as factors in a multivariable linear regression, also adjusted for demographics, with separate analyses for those contributing samples cross-sectionally or longitudinally. Outcomes were Shannon diversity and relative abundance of specific bacterial taxa (

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsBacteriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFecesFemaleHumansMaleMetagenomicsMiddle AgedUnited KingdomYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agentsantimicrobial resistancegut microbiomehumaninfectious diseasemetagenomicsmicrobiology

Identifiers

PMID41370178
PMCPMC12695023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.