ArticleRevista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia2025
Gigantomastia following the use of a subdermal contraceptive: a case report
Article in Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe a case of secondary gigantomastia following the use of a subdermal contraceptive implant, as well as to evaluate the probable causality of the implant as the cause of this condition. Materials and methods: We present the case of a 23-year-old nulligravid patient who, one month after the insertion of a subdermal contraceptive implant, began to experience rapid breast enlargement, mastalgia, localized pruritus, back pain, and an anxiety disorder. Complementary studies ruled out a hormonal, oncological, or pregnancy-related etiology. Two months after the insertion of the subdermal implant, it was removed; however, breast gland enlargement continued after its removal. Reduction mammoplasty was required for definitive treatment. The Naranjo algorithm was applied to determine the likelihood of a causal relationship. Conclusions: To the best of the authors' knowledge, the probable association between gigantomastia and the use of subdermal contraceptives has not been previously described in the literature. It is important to monitor patients with progesterone implants for the development of gigantomastia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.