ArticleCarbon balance and management2025
How does thinning affect the carbon budget of a subtropical coniferous plantation?
Article in Carbon balance and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Short-Term Effects of Thinning on the Carbon Sink Function of Secondary Broadleaf Forest Ecosystems.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo mitigate climate change, China has established extensive plantations since the 1970s, making a substantial contribution to the terrestrial carbon sink. However, after decades of growth, plantations require effective management due to potential ecological risks. While thinning can provide long-term economic and ecological benefits for planted forests, it also imposes significant short-term disturbances that may result in temporary carbon sink losses. This raises a critical question: How does thinning affect forest carbon budgets on Earth? This issue is very controversial, largely due to variations in climate conditions, methodological approaches, and study scales. Consequently, in this study, three methods were used to quantify the effects of thinning on carbon fluxes and provide a theoretical and practical basis for carbon budget estimation and forest management.
resultsThe 1-tower, look-up table (LUT), and 2-tower methods were used to investigate the effects of thinning on carbon fluxes. Among them, the 2-tower method is considered the most dependable which tracked the seasonal variation pattern of the carbon fluxes best. The 1-tower method is direct and easy to conduct but may involve estimation biases introduced by climatic interannual variations. While the LUT method could theoretically diminish the effects of the varying climate, it was weak in tracking relatively extreme values. The three methods yielded consistent results, indicating that 25% thinning enhanced gross primary productivity (GPP), net ecosystem productivity (NEP), and ecosystem respiration (Re). According to the 2-tower results, in the first year after thinning, the GPP increased by 9.8%, and it increased more in the second year after thinning, reaching 14.6%. However, a much greater increase in Re was found in the second year after thinning than in the first year, with values of 23.2% and 12.6%, respectively. Consequently, the increases in NEP induced by GPP were offset by increasing Re, which was 5.4% and 0.5% in the first and second years after thinning, respectively.
conclusionsThinning enhanced the GPP, Re, and NEP in the subtropical forest, indicating the positive effects of thinning in a near-mature coniferous plantation, even shortly after thinning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.