ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025
Can sacubitril/valsartan enhance sleep quality and reduce daytime dysfunction in HFrEF patients?
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCongestive heart failure (CHF) affects 65 million people worldwide, with significant prevalence among the elderly. Despite therapeutic advancements, CHF often coexists sleep disorder, impacting morbidity and mortality. Optimizing heart failure management is crucial, especially in light of recent debates on respiratory therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Sacubitril/valsartan (SV) has shown promise in reducing cardiovascular mortality and hospital readmissions, though its impact on sleep is less explored.
methodsThis prospective, cohort, open-label study evaluated HFrEF patients with LVEF < 40%, NYHA class II-IV, and optimized medical management. Exclusions included sleep apnea, primary insomnia, or psychiatric conditions. Patients transitioned from ACE inhibitors or ARBs to SV, with dose adjustments and biweekly clinical assessments. Sleep quality and daytime alertness were measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at baseline and after reaching the target dosage of SV. Functional capacity was assessed via the six-minute walk test (6-MWT).
resultsOver a mean follow-up of 132 ± 31 days, adjusted analyses showed improvement in PSQI (β - 2.60, 95% CI - 3.20 to - 2.00; p < 0.001) and ESS (β - 3.10, - 3.80 to - 2.40; p < 0.001), with increases in LVEF (+ 6.8 pp, + 5.2 to + 8.3; p < 0.001) and 6-MWT (+ 96 m, + 35 to + 157; p = 0.002); odds of PSQI > 5 and ESS ≥ 11 at follow-up were lower (OR 0.30, 0.18-0.48; p < 0.001 and OR 0.25, 0.11-0.52; p = 0.001; Table 3, and 4).
conclusionSV improves sleep quality, reduces daytime dysfunction, and enhances exercise capacity in HFrEF patients, indicating potential dual therapeutic benefits. Further studies are needed to explore SV's full impact on sleep parameters and quality of life in this high-risk group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41370000What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.