ReviewEpigenetics2025
The technology landscape for detection of DNA methylation in cancer liquid biopsies.
Review in Epigenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative Epigenomics: Bioinformatics Strategies for Multi-Omics Data Analysis in Health and Disease.Epigenomes · 2026Review
- Multifeature sequencing-based liquid biopsy for cancer diagnosis and monitoring.Genome medicine · 2026Review
- Interpreting ctDNA dynamics in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) therapy-timing may be key.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Ultra-mild bisulphite sequencing for DNA methylation analysis from low-input clinical specimens.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Article
- Epigenetic profiling of circulating cell-free DNA for early detection and minimal residual disease assessment in lung cancer: a focus on DNA methylation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- 5mC and 5hmC methylation sequencing: the power of 6-base sequencing in a multiomic era.Epigenomics · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA methylation is a well-studied epigenetic factor and has become a powerful player in the cancer biomarker research field. Together with the rising interest in methylation biomarkers, the technological advances for the detection of DNA methylation have been immense. This has led to a plethora of different methods. The first methods were established for DNA methylation detection in genomic DNA, while new methods have focused more on compatibility with the emerging interest of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from liquid biopsies. As DNA methylation detection in cfDNA brings its own challenges, a shift from the gold standard bisulfite conversion towards enzymatic conversion methods can be observed in recent years. In this review, we aim to summarize the classic and more recent DNA methylation detection methods for liquid biopsies. Importantly, the few existing European Certified In Vitro Diagnostics (CE-IVD) clinical applications for liquid biopsies are also described, underlining the potential of DNA methylation as a detection biomarker in cfDNA. Furthermore, we provide some insights into how the field might evolve in the future, where we believe enzymatic conversion might become a new gold standard and direct sequencing methods, such as ONT-sequencing, will get an important place in the epigenetic research field. Lastly, we believe that multi-omics technologies, which can combine diverse types of biomarkers, will most likely become more important in future clinical applications. Moreover, novel recent technologies are being developed and show promising clinical applications. Taken together, methylation biomarkers are becoming more important for clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.