Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41369971›Full record

ArticlePain and therapy2026

Machine Learning-Based Prediction for Axial Pain Following Expansive Unilateral Open-Door Laminoplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Kelun Huang, Sheng Li, Yile Dai, Dingjun Xu, Guoliang Chen, Yaozhi He, Ziwei Fan, Honglin Teng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Effects of opening toward symptomatic side versus ossified side on effectiveness of unilateral open-door laminoplasty for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament with symptom-ossification mismatch].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kelun Huang *Department of Orthopedics (Spine Surgery), The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, Zhejiang, China.
Sheng Li *Department of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Ruian City, Wenzhou, 325200, Zhejiang, China.
Yile Dai *Department of Ultrasonic Diagnosis, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, Zhejiang, China.
Dingjun XuDepartment of Orthopedics (Spine Surgery), The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, Zhejiang, China.
Guoliang ChenDepartment of Orthopedics (Spine Surgery), The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, Zhejiang, China.
Yaozhi HeDepartment of Orthopedics (Spine Surgery), The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, Zhejiang, China.
Ziwei Fan *Department of Orthopedics (Spine Surgery), The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, Zhejiang, China. fzw_formal@163.com.
Honglin Teng *Department of Orthopedics (Spine Surgery), The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, Zhejiang, China. tenghonglin@wzhospital.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAxial pain is a common complication following expansive unilateral open-door laminoplasty (ELAP); however, traditional statistical methods are unable to effectively predict this complication. This study developed machine learning (ML) models to predict post-ELAP axial pain and identify key predictors.

methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 851 cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients undergoing ELAP, split into training (n = 714) and temporal validation sets (n = 137). Demographic, imaging, clinical, and surgical data were collected. Predictive features were selected by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression, followed by ML model development with grid search optimizing hyperparameters. The top-performing model underwent temporal validation, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analyzed predictor contributions.

resultsThe training set included 218 axial pain cases; the test set had 47. Key predictors (C7 laminoplasty, cervical kyphosis, etc.) were identified to develop ML model. Post-optimization, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) achieved superior performance (internal validation area under the receiver [AUC] = 0.948; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.918-0.978), maintained in temporal validation (AUC = 0.906; 95% CI 0.858-0.954). Through SHAP analysis, the predictors were ranked in descending order of importance as follows: C7 laminoplasty, quantity-based surgical segment classification, cervical kyphosis, angle of lamina open-door, cervical lordosis, and occupying rate of cervical spinal canal.

conclusionsML models coupled with SHAP analysis effectively predict post-ELAP axial pain, identifying the key predictors. Performing segment-selective ELAP, avoiding unnecessary C7 laminoplasty, and maintaining optimal open-door angle are critical factors in avoiding the occurrence of axial pain following ELAP.

Indexed as

Axial painCervical spondylotic myelopathyExpansive unilateral open-door laminoplastyMachine learningPrognostic prediction

Identifiers

PMID41369971
PMCPMC12804451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.