ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Microsurgical resection of skull base meningioma involving internal carotid artery: The power of blood flow reconstruction.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the application and clinical outcomes of blood flow reconstruction techniques in the microsurgical management of skull base meningiomas involving critical vasculature, a retrospective analysis was conducted on 12 patients who underwent microsurgical tumor resection combined with vascular reconstruction between September 2016 and March 2025.Preoperative and postoperative imaging evaluations included contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography angiography (CTA), and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Of the 12 patients, 2 were newly diagnosed, while 10 had recurrent meningiomas following previous surgical interventions. Involvement of the internal carotid artery (ICA) by the tumor was classified as encasement (n = 4), displacement (n = 5), or luminal stenosis (n = 3). Vascular reconstruction was achieved through superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass (n = 4), internal carotid artery-radial artery-middle cerebral artery bypass (n = 4), and petrous segment-radial artery(RA)-clinoidal segment bypass (n = 4). Intraoperative assessments and postoperative imaging confirmed satisfactory graft patency in all cases. Gross total resection (Simpson grade I) was achieved in every patient. During a mean follow-up period(19.2 ± 15.3 months), no evidence of tumor recurrence was observed. Blood Flow Reconstruction in skull base meningiomas with involvement of major vessels facilitates more complete tumor resection and mitigates the likelihood of postoperative residual tumor and recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41369922What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.