ArticleInternational orthopaedics2026
Accuracy of intraoperative leg length and stem version measurements in robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty using the Mako system with enhanced mode.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluated the accuracy of intraoperative leg length and femoral anteversion measurements obtained during total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the Mako robotic system with enhanced mode.
methodsA total of 55 hips in four men and 51 women who underwent primary THA with the Mako system via an anterolateral approach were retrospectively evaluated. Intraoperative measurements of leg length and femoral anteversion displayed by the Mako enhanced mode were compared with postoperative CT-based measurements. Absolute errors and their distributions were calculated to assess the accuracy of intraoperative assessments.
resultsThe mean absolute error was 2.3 ± 1.8 mm for postoperative leg length discrepancy and 2.9 ± 2.2° for stem anteversion. Of the 55 hips, 46 (83.6%) showed leg length errors within 3 mm and 51 (92.7%) within 5 mm. For stem anteversion, 48 hips (87.3%) were within 3° and all 55 hips (100%) were within 5°. Mako enhanced mode could not be completed in 10.7% of cases because of femoral array loosening or screw penetration into the medullary canal.
conclusionMako enhanced mode demonstrated clinically acceptable accuracy for intraoperative measurement of leg length and femoral anteversion, contributing to precise femoral stem implantation in robotic-assisted THA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41369902What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.