ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Differentiation of tumor budding grade in colon cancer using noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic image in dual-energy CT.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the value of noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic image (VMI+) in dual-energy CT (DECT) in predicting tumor budding (TB) grade in colon cancer.
methodsSeventy-six patients with pathologically confirmed colon cancer who underwent contrast-enhanced DECT were retrospectively enrolled and were divided into low/intermediate-grade TB (n = 52) and high-grade TB groups (n = 24). The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), overall image quality, and lesion delineation were evaluated on VMI+ (40-0 keV with an interval of 10 keV). The DECT quantitative parameters were analyzed, including attenuation of VMI+, iodine concentration (IC), normalized IC (NIC), electron density (Rho), and effective atomic number (Zeff). The diagnostic performance in differentiating TB grade in colon cancer was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC).
results40 keV, 50 keV, and 60 keV showed good diagnostic performance in differentiating TB grade (AUC: 0.825, 0.833, and 0.843; sensitivity: 0.708, 0.708, and 0.750; specificity: 0.904, 0.904, and 0.846; cutoff value: 179.5 HU, 129.9 HU, and 101.2 HU) and had significantly higher AUC than IC (0.770), NIC (0.647), Rho (0.642), and Zeff (0.785) (all P < 0.05). 40 keV had the best lesion delineation and provided significantly higher CNR than other VMI + levels, while 60 keV provided better overall image quality than other VMI + levels (all corrected P < 0.05).
conclusionsThe DECT-derived low-keV VMI+ (40 keV, 50 keV, and 60 keV) provided better diagnostic performance in differentiating TB grade in colon cancer. 40 keV showed better CNR and lesion delineation, while 60 keV provided better overall image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41369899What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.