Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41369893›Full record

ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Differentiation of osteoarthritis phenotypes on MRI using artificial intelligence].

Kirsten Schleid, Assil-Ramin Alimy, Tim Hoenig, Simon Westfechtel, Sven Nebelung, Frank Timo Beil, Tim Rolvien

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kirsten SchleidKlinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Assil-Ramin AlimyKlinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Tim HoenigKlinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Simon WestfechtelKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland.
Sven NebelungKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland.
Frank Timo BeilKlinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Tim RolvienKlinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. t.rolvien@uke.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common joint diseases, affecting more than 500 million people worldwide. In recent decades, there has only been limited progress in terms of diagnosis and treatment. For a long time, OA was considered to be primarily a mechanically induced degenerative disease. However, more recent work has shown that OA is a heterogeneous condition that manifests in different phenotypes. Although artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly important in medical research, its specific application in the field of OA remains limited in clinical use.

objectivesThe aim of this review is to summarize the current approaches to phenotyping OA and to highlight the role of AI in the identification and classification of OA phenotypes. MATERIALS AND

methodsSelective literature review

resultsThere are several promising applications of AI in OA diagnosis and assessment, such as automated assessment of cartilage damage or prediction of the need for arthroplasty. Close cooperation between orthopaedics, radiology, and AI experts is necessary to integrate AI models into clinical practice.

conclusionsThe use of AI to detect and assess OA-typical changes offers major potential to improve diagnostic imaging, clinical interpretation, and disease prognosis. Through more precise diagnoses and individualized prognoses, AI-based methods could significantly contribute to making treatment decisions more effective and, thus, optimizing patient care overall.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMagnetic Resonance ImagingOsteoarthritisHumansPhenotypePrognosisBiomedical researchDeep learningMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.