ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Differentiation of osteoarthritis phenotypes on MRI using artificial intelligence].
Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research progress of diffusion tensor imaging in lumbar degenerative diseases: a narrative review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common joint diseases, affecting more than 500 million people worldwide. In recent decades, there has only been limited progress in terms of diagnosis and treatment. For a long time, OA was considered to be primarily a mechanically induced degenerative disease. However, more recent work has shown that OA is a heterogeneous condition that manifests in different phenotypes. Although artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly important in medical research, its specific application in the field of OA remains limited in clinical use.
objectivesThe aim of this review is to summarize the current approaches to phenotyping OA and to highlight the role of AI in the identification and classification of OA phenotypes. MATERIALS AND
methodsSelective literature review
resultsThere are several promising applications of AI in OA diagnosis and assessment, such as automated assessment of cartilage damage or prediction of the need for arthroplasty. Close cooperation between orthopaedics, radiology, and AI experts is necessary to integrate AI models into clinical practice.
conclusionsThe use of AI to detect and assess OA-typical changes offers major potential to improve diagnostic imaging, clinical interpretation, and disease prognosis. Through more precise diagnoses and individualized prognoses, AI-based methods could significantly contribute to making treatment decisions more effective and, thus, optimizing patient care overall.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41369893What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.