Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41369829›Full record

ArticlePituitary2025

Standardizing blood pressure phenotyping in acromegaly: A practical companion to Araujo-Castro et al.

M Vijayasimha

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M VijayasimhaDepartment of MLT, University Institute of Allied Health Science, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, 140413, India. vijaya.e19133@cumail.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2038-7006

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension affects nearly half of patients with acromegaly, yet current studies inconsistently report blood pressure phenotypes due to variability in the use of office, home, and ambulatory monitoring. This companion article proposes a standardized, risk-stratified approach using ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring to classify sustained, masked, and nocturnal hypertension and to guide antihypertensive de-escalation in relation to biochemical control. The framework incorporates key timepoints-diagnosis, early post-therapy reassessment, and long-term follow-up-while emphasizing modality-specific diagnostic thresholds, dipping patterns, and cardiovascular risk profiles. Structured follow-up using periodic ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and validated home monitoring enables more precise phenotyping, optimizes treatment decisions, and improves comparability across future acromegaly cohorts.

Indexed as

AcromegalyBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHypertensionAge FactorsBlood PressureFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMalePractice Guidelines as TopicRisk AssessmentSex Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.