Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41369798›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Latent profile analysis of potential health-promoting behaviors in patients after esophageal cancer surgery: a multicenter cross-sectional survey.

Juan Wang, Yuan Yu, Li Liu, Yan Miao, Yue Fu, Yanting Ning, Junli Liang

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Judicious use of latent profile analysis in supportive care: the distinction between mono- and multi-construct applications.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juan WangSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 510060, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yuan YuNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100021, Beijing, China. zlyyyuyuan@163.com.
Li LiuSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 510060, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yan MiaoSichuan Cancer Hospital, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yue FuNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100021, Beijing, China.
Yanting NingNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 518116, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Junli LiangThe Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050000, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objectives of this study were to identify potential health-promoting behaviors in patients after esophageal cancer surgery and explore their influencing factors by performing latent profile analysis.

methodsA convenience sampling method was used to select 438 postoperative patients with esophageal cancer from 14 cancer centers across the country as survey participants. A sociodemographic and disease-related information collection form, the revised version of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile-II, the Social Support Rating Scale, and the Chinese version of the cancer self-efficacy scale were used. A latent profile analysis of potential health-promoting behaviors was conducted, and the factors influencing each category were identified through single-factor analysis and logistic regression analysis.

resultsThe health-promoting behaviors of patients after esophageal cancer surgery could be divided into three categories: low-level health-promoting behaviors (27.6%, n = 121), medium-level health-promoting behaviors (56.2%, n = 246), and high-level health-promoting behaviors (16.2%, n = 71). The results of logistic regression analysis revealed that age, education level, place of residence, the receipt of neoadjuvant treatment before surgery, the level of social support, and the level of self-efficacy after esophageal cancer surgery were factors influencing health-promoting behaviors (all P < 0.05).

conclusionsThe health-promoting behaviors of patients after esophageal cancer surgery are heterogeneous. Medical staff can perform individualized interventions for patients after esophageal cancer surgery according to the different types of influencing factors to improve their health-promoting behaviors.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionAdultAgedChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf EfficacySocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesEsophageal cancerHealth-promoting behaviorInfluencing factorsLatent profile analysis

Identifiers

PMID41369798
PMCPMC12696073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.