Trial reportLasers in medical science2025
Effect of 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser or 15% calcium sodium phosphosilicate prophy paste on dentin hypersensitivity over six months: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study had the main purpose of comparing the desensitizing effect of Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm) and a 15% calcium sodium phosphosilicate paste (CSP-NovaMin) for the treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity (CDH) throughout the 6-month follow-up period (TRN #2291636, Sep/2017). In total, 67 patients were selected after a baseline evaluation with a visual analog scale, including middling and severe pain levels, above 4 cm at the scale. Patients were randomly allocated to one of the groups: Nd:YAG laser (100 mJ, 1W, 10 Hz, 83.3 J/cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
41369796What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.