ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
Measurement study of the "optimal" screw axis location and its angles with the first and second metacarpals based on X imaging of the scaphoid bone.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate screw placement is pivotal to the success of internal fixation of scaphoid fractures. However, no anatomically standardized reference currently exists for guiding entry-point selection and screw-axis orientation during percutaneous Herbert-screw fixation through the volar approach. Conventional techniques rely heavily on surgeon experience or intraoperative fluoroscopy, thereby increasing radiation exposure and compromising accuracy. This study proposes a novel reference method based on the angular relationship between the scaphoid screw axis and the first and second metacarpals, and to assess its anatomical consistency and potential clinical utility.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on radiographs of healthy adults from 2021 to 2023, including anteroposterior and lateral wrist views. Two senior trainees and two experienced surgeons measured the imaging data. The measurements included the screw axis length, angles between the screw axis and metacarpal axes, skin thickness(the thickness beneath the skin of the scaphoid tubercle), and entry point distance(the vertical distance from the intersection of the extended screw axis with the palmar skin to the apex of the scaphoid tubercle). The influences of the thumb position, gender, and skin thickness on the screw axis orientation and entry point location were analyzed.
resultsA total of 151 adults were analyzed, including 87 females (57.6%) and 64 males (42.4%) with an average age of 43.2 ± 15.9 years. In the lateral view, the mean angle between the screw axis and the second metacarpal axis was 71.5° ± 6.7°, with minimal variance, indicating high consistency across individuals. In the PA view, the angle between the screw axis and the first metacarpal axis varied with the thumb position: 4.8° ± 2.8° in abduction versus 18.7° ± 5.7° at rest. In some cases, the axes were nearly parallel in abduction. The screw axis length measured in the lateral view was closely aligned with that reported in previous anatomical studies (male 2.5 ± 0.3 cm vs. female 2.2 ± 0.2 cm, p < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between subcutaneous thickness and entry point distance (r = 0.048, p = 0.559). Additionally, males had greater entry point distances (males 1.5 ± 0.3 cm vs females 1.3 ± 0.3 cm, p < 0.001).
conclusionsIn this study, we find a defined anatomical relationship between the scaphoid screw axis and the axes of the first and second metacarpals. Additionally, the guidewire entry point on the skin should be located distal to the scaphoid tubercle, with the distance varying by gender. The second metacarpal is recommended as a lateral view guide because of its stability and consistency, whereas the first metacarpal can be used in the PA view, particularly when the thumb is in abduction. Further clinical validation through prospective studies is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.