Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41369780›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2025

Mapping regenerative value network configurations of marine plastics in the global commons.

Taryn Mead, Hanna Dijkstra, Kipp Godfrey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Taryn MeadSchool of Architecture and Design, IE University, C. Cardenal Zúñiga, 12 40003, Segovia, Spain. taryn.mead@ie.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0784-0136
Hanna DijkstraInstitute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1111, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7010-7589
Kipp GodfreySchool of Business, Western Colorado University, 1 Western Way, Gunnison, CO, 81230, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While many companies have made claims regarding regenerative efforts in recent years, analytical frameworks are sparse that clearly demonstrate how claims of regeneration can be differentiated from claims of sustainability. This study proposes the use of Regenerative Value Networks (RVNs) as a theoretical framework to analyze these claims and refine the descriptive approaches to claims of regenerative efforts, particularly for marine plastics in the global commons. In this exploratory study, five cases of new materials generated from marine plastics were analyzed to understand how value networks were constructed and what types of regenerative value were created. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis was used in a comparative analysis across cases. Preliminary data analysis led to the question "But who is paying whom for what?" and a series of value configuration maps were developed to better understand these relationships. Types of value exchanged in the RVNs were categorized as material, social, ecological, and economic, contributing to a more robust theoretical framework for claims of regeneration in business. Further research should include quantitative measures of the regenerative impact of these value networks in the context of the global commons' pollution, the role of certifications in regenerative business claims, and additional types of less tangible value created by RVN activities.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesPlasticsPlasticsMarine plasticsRegenerative businessRegenerative value networksSustainability, Case studies

Identifiers

PMID41369780
PMCPMC12696009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.