Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41369775›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2026

New approach methodologies for metabolic disruption: a high-throughput human liver cell phospholipidosis assay.

Neele Wewer, Albert Braeuning, Dajana Lichtenstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neele WewerDept. Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-1308-453X
Albert BraeuningDept. Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3810-027X
Dajana LichtensteinDept. Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany. dajana.lichtenstein@bfr.bund.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2699-677X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phospholipidosis (PLD) is the excessive accumulation of phospholipids within cells, which is, for example, observed in the liver following exposure to certain chemicals or drugs. Although the precise molecular mechanisms underlying PLD remain incompletely elucidated, it is documented that PLD is frequently induced by cationic amphiphilic compounds. To facilitate the identification of potential PLD inducers across diverse groups of chemicals, the development of novel high-throughput screening methodologies is imperative. Here, an in vitro human liver cell culture system was established for PLD screening, employing the fluorescence-based LipidTox assay in differentiated HepaRG cells in a 96-well format. Cells were treated with a selection of 35 compounds characterized as either PLD inducers or non-inducers, based on previously published in vivo data. Concentration-response curves of phospholipid accumulation were assessed and the results were compared with existing in vivo, in vitro and in silico datasets. The findings confirm the applicability of the LipidTOX assay in differentiated HepaRG cells as a reliable in vitro-based high-throughput screening method for PLD prediction, achieving an overall predictivity of 86%.

Indexed as

HepatocytesHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysLipidosesLiverPhospholipidsCell LineDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansPhospholipidsHepaRGHepatocytesHigh-throughput imagingIn vitroNew approach methodologiesPhospholipidosis

Identifiers

PMID41369775
PMCPMC12967516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.