ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Biomarker testing for carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract].
Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predictive biomarker testing is nowadays an integral part of modern diagnostics and treatment planning for esophageal and gastric cancer. It currently consists mainly of immunohistochemically determined markers, namely the PD-L1 status (stated by the Tumor Proportion Score [TPS], Combined Positivity Score [CPS] and Tumor Area Proportion [TAP] Score) in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas, as well as the HER2 status (supplemented by in situ hybridization in case of equivocal results), the mismatch repair status (optionally supplemented by molecular pathological determination of microsatellite status), and, since mid-2024, the expression of claudin 18.2 in gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. An expansion of the panel by FGFR2b is expected in the near future. In addition to the quality guideline-compliant technical performance of the tests, the biological heterogeneity of many of these biomarkers is also a diagnostic and clinical challenge. The current article provides an overview of current biomarker testing in the context of current treatment options for cancer of the upper gastrointestinal tract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.