Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41369711›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2025

Including people with lived experience in the development of the self-Dehumanisation in Psychosis Scale (DiPS): a reflective account.

Tom A Jenkins, Anneli Bale, Linda Alush, Ed Brooks, Ian Carter, Eva Roberts, Pamela Jacobsen, Paul Chadwick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tom A JenkinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. tj260@bath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7875-4417
Anneli BaleSchool of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Frenchay Campus, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK.
Linda AlushDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Ed Brooks, Bristol, UK.
Ian Carter, Bristol, UK.
Eva RobertsDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8760-9412
Pamela JacobsenDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8847-7775
Paul ChadwickDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6765-6325

Funding

Mental Health Research UK Mental Health Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLived experience involvement in measure development is recognised as best practice. This article is a reflective account, co-written between researchers and PPIE (Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement) consultants with lived experience of psychosis, about the impact of lived experience involvement in developing the self-Dehumanisation in Psychosis Scale (DiPS). Reporting is guided by the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public 2 - Short Form (GRIPP2-SF). METHODOLOGY: In developing the DiPS, people with lived experience of psychosis contributed both as research participants and as PPIE consultants across multiple stages of development. This included in study document review; identification of domains; item generation, refinement, and amendment; psychometric validation; and dissemination.

resultsContributions made by people with lived experience were significant across all stages of developing the DiPS, including developing and shaping conceptual understanding of self-dehumanisation; item generation and selection; and improving the comprehensibility and acceptability of the measure. DISCUSSION: Working collaboratively with people lived experience in measure development can be of benefit both to the validity of the measure, and to those involved. We reflect on the value and importance of working collaboratively, and offer recommendations based on our experiences for researchers co-developing measures.

Indexed as

Psychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotic DisordersHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID41369711
PMCPMC12799854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.