ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2025
Including people with lived experience in the development of the self-Dehumanisation in Psychosis Scale (DiPS): a reflective account.
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Including people with lived experience in the development of the self-Dehumanisation in Psychosis Scale (DiPS): a reflective account.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLived experience involvement in measure development is recognised as best practice. This article is a reflective account, co-written between researchers and PPIE (Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement) consultants with lived experience of psychosis, about the impact of lived experience involvement in developing the self-Dehumanisation in Psychosis Scale (DiPS). Reporting is guided by the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public 2 - Short Form (GRIPP2-SF). METHODOLOGY: In developing the DiPS, people with lived experience of psychosis contributed both as research participants and as PPIE consultants across multiple stages of development. This included in study document review; identification of domains; item generation, refinement, and amendment; psychometric validation; and dissemination.
resultsContributions made by people with lived experience were significant across all stages of developing the DiPS, including developing and shaping conceptual understanding of self-dehumanisation; item generation and selection; and improving the comprehensibility and acceptability of the measure. DISCUSSION: Working collaboratively with people lived experience in measure development can be of benefit both to the validity of the measure, and to those involved. We reflect on the value and importance of working collaboratively, and offer recommendations based on our experiences for researchers co-developing measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.