ReviewEuropean journal of ageing2025
Toward an inclusive future: a systematic review on the implications of ageism for people with dementia.
Review in European journal of ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Primary care determinants for timely diagnosis of dementia.Family medicine and community health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ageism remains a pervasive societal issue that significantly affects individuals with dementia, influencing cognitive performance, healthcare access, and social inclusion. This systematic review synthesizes existing research on the implications of ageism for people with dementia, focusing on its impact on cognitive function, stigma, and healthcare disparities. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. After screening 515 articles, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed for key findings on ageism's effects. Findings indicate that age-related stereotypes negatively impact cognitive assessments, often leading to misdiagnosis and unnecessary anxiety regarding cognitive decline. Studies show that exposure to negative aging stereotypes correlates with poorer cognitive performance, reinforcing stereotype threat. Additionally, ageism in healthcare settings results in differential treatment, with older adults facing delays in diagnosis and limited access to specialized care. Social stigma further compounds these challenges, contributing to social isolation and decreased well-being among individuals with dementia. Research highlights the role of intergenerational programs and public awareness campaigns in mitigating these effects, promoting inclusivity and reducing ageist attitudes. Addressing ageism requires a multifaceted approach, including policy changes, caregiver training, and societal initiatives to reshape perceptions of aging and dementia. Future research should explore long-term interventions that foster positive aging attitudes and equitable healthcare practices. This review underscores the necessity of dismantling ageist biases to enhance the quality of life and care for individuals with dementia, advocating for a more inclusive and respectful societal framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.