Review in Chemical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Ahmadreza RahbariHeadquarters, XINTC B.V., Loubergweg 22-24, 6961 EK Eerbeek, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6474-3028
Thejas Hulikal ChakrapaniInstitute for Multiscale Thermofluids, School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FB, United Kingdom.
Fei ShuangDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6333-9237
Panagiotis KrokidasNational Centre for Scientific Research "Demokritos", 15310 Aghia Paraskevi Attikis, Greece.
Parsa HabibiEngineering Thermodynamics, Process & Energy Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 39, 2628 CB Delft, The Netherlands.
V Jelle LagerweijEngineering Thermodynamics, Process & Energy Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 39, 2628 CB Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0000-6839-530X
Mahinder RamdinEngineering Thermodynamics, Process & Energy Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 39, 2628 CB Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8476-7035
Thijs J H VlugtEngineering Thermodynamics, Process & Energy Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 39, 2628 CB Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3059-8712
Hadi HajibeygiGeoscience and Engineering Department, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8517-8283
Poulumi DeyDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4679-1752
Ioannis N TsimpanogiannisChemical Process & Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Centre for Research & Technology Hellas (CERTH), 57001 Thermi-Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3466-1873
Othonas A MoultosEngineering Thermodynamics, Process & Energy Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 39, 2628 CB Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7477-9684
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
This extensive review highlights the central role of classical molecular simulation in advancing hydrogen (H
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Molecular Simulation of Hydrogen Systems: From Properties and Methods to Applications and Future Directions. · full record | OpenQuestion