Trial reportThe British journal of surgery2025
Outcomes after elective inguinal hernia repair with mesh performed by associate clinicians versus medical doctors in Sierra Leone: 5-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in The British journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInguinal hernia repair is one of the most performed surgical procedures, but, nevertheless, there is a high unmet need, with over 200 million people worldwide living with an inguinal hernia. The aims of this study were to evaluate 5-year outcomes after anterior mesh inguinal hernia repair, to assess the safety of a training intervention, and to compare the outcomes of patients operated on by a medical doctor (MD) versus an associate clinician (AC).
methodsAdult men with a primary inguinal hernia were included either as training patients or in the randomized trial, with surgical treatment performed by an MD or an AC. Patients were followed up mostly at hospital or at home; questionnaire information was collected and physical examinations were performed. Outcomes of training and trial patients were compared and outcomes of patients who underwent surgeries performed by MDs or ACs during the trial were compared.
resultsIn total, 129 patients were included in the training group and 229 patients were included in the randomized trial group. At 5-year follow-up, 288 patients (80.4%) were alive, 40 patients (11.2%) had died, and 30 patients (8.4%) were lost to follow-up. The overall recurrence rate was 5.0% and the all-cause mortality rate was 11.2%. Mortality and recurrence were not significantly different between the training and trial patients or between the patients who underwent surgeries performed by MDs or ACs during the trial.
conclusionLong-term outcomes after primary elective inguinal mesh hernia repair indicate that hands-on short-course training can be implemented effectively and that task sharing is safe and effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.