Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41369606›Full record

ArticleJACC. Case reports2026

Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in a Patient With Iatrogenic Type A Aortic Dissection.

Dominik Geiger, Gaik Nersesian, Leonard Pitts, Anna Stegmann, Yuriy Hrytsyna, Sascha Ott, Pia Lanmueller, Semih Buz, Volkmar Falk, Evgenij Potapov

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dominik GeigerDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: dominik.geiger@dhzc-charite.de.
Gaik NersesianDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Leonard PittsDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Anna StegmannDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Yuriy HrytsynaDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sascha OttDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Berlin, Germany.
Pia LanmuellerDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Semih BuzDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Volkmar FalkDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute of Translational Medicine, Translational Cardiovascular Technologies, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Evgenij PotapovDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock often requires urgent mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and, if recovery fails, definitive replacement therapy. We report the complex management of a 49-year-old man who developed an iatrogenic type A aortic dissection (iTAAD) after failed percutaneous coronary intervention. CASE SUMMARY: Initial stabilization with an Impella device was complicated by vascular injury and hemodynamic instability, requiring escalation to advanced MCS. As the iTAAD remained stable without systemic malperfusion, conservative management was chosen. Persistent severe left ventricular dysfunction prevented recovery, leading to implantation of a durable left ventricular assist device. DISCUSSION: Unlike spontaneous dissections, iTAADs arise from focal procedural injury, and-without malperfusion-may be safely managed conservatively, although no formal guidelines exist. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: In selected patients with stable iTAAD and cardiogenic shock due to concomitant myocardial infarction, a "watchful waiting" strategy combined with MCS can safely bridge to durable left ventricular assist device implantation.

Indexed as

cardiogenic shockiTAADLVADMCSPCI

Identifiers

PMID41369606
PMCPMC12882322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.