ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2025
buzzdetect: an open-source deep learning tool for automated bioacoustic pollinator monitoring.
Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancement of methods in insect science: from genes to ecosystems.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ecological studies of pollinators often require long-term and extensive monitoring, posing a significant cost and limitation to research. Traditional sampling methods of observation such as sweep netting and pan trapping provide valuable information on pollinator diversity, but scale poorly when conducting large sampling efforts across space and time. We introduce "buzzdetect," a tool to apply deep learning models to audio data for passive acoustic monitoring of pollinators, and test our accompanying audio classification model. The model is capable of distinguishing the buzzing of insect flight from environmental noise on a second-by-second basis with a sensitivity of 28% and a precision of 95%. As a demonstration of the value of buzzdetect, we apply the tool to recordings from 4 crops and 1 wildflower. The results reveal differences in timing and intensity of foraging that correspond with prior literature: activity peaked earliest for chicory and latest for soybean, while total activity was higher in mustard and soybean than in the other crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.