Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41369492›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

The Molecular Sieving of Propylene and Propane on SAPO-35 Molecular Sieve.

Yansi Tong, Kadi Hu, Qihao Yang, Hao Liu, Danhua Yuan, Jungang Wang, Mengting Lv, Hailong Wang, Ziqi Tian, Yunpeng Xu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yansi TongZhejiang Key Laboratory of Advanced Fuel Cells and Electrolyzers Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China.
Kadi HuZhejiang Key Laboratory of Advanced Fuel Cells and Electrolyzers Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7685-6428
Qihao YangZhejiang Key Laboratory of Advanced Fuel Cells and Electrolyzers Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0933-4483
Hao LiuZhejiang Key Laboratory of Advanced Fuel Cells and Electrolyzers Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China.
Danhua YuanUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Jungang WangChina State Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion, Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan 030001, China.
Mengting LvZhejiang Key Laboratory of Advanced Fuel Cells and Electrolyzers Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China.
Hailong WangZhejiang Key Laboratory of Advanced Fuel Cells and Electrolyzers Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China.
Ziqi TianZhejiang Key Laboratory of Advanced Fuel Cells and Electrolyzers Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5667-597X
Yunpeng XuUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Liang ChenZhejiang Key Laboratory of Advanced Fuel Cells and Electrolyzers Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 22575260Ningbo Natural Science Foundation 2024J010Ningbo Yongjiang Talent Introduction Programme 2021A-036-BScience and Technology Innovation 2025 Program in Ningbo 2022Z205Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion J25-26-610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective adsorption is regarded as a promising alternative for propylene/propane separation. However, the similar physicochemical properties of these two components pose a challenge in developing adsorbents that simultaneously exhibit high selectivity and substantial adsorption capacity. This study aims to achieve molecular sieving of propylene and propane by precisely controlling the pore size of silicoaluminophosphate (SAPO) molecular sieve. The pore size of the eight-membered-ring SAPO-35 molecular sieve is tuned via ion exchange to fall between the kinetic diameters of propylene and propane, enabling selective adsorption of propylene while excluding propane molecules. Ion exchange treatment increased the equilibrium adsorption selectivity of the SAPO-35 from 2.2 to 11.4, placing it among the highest-performing molecular sieve-based adsorbents. This modification also substantially improved the material's regeneration capability at ambient temperature. Theoretical calculations reveal that steric hindrance effects, arising when gas molecules diffuse through the eight-membered-ring channels, contribute significantly to the high adsorption selectivity. Breakthrough experiments demonstrated that Na-SAPO-35 achieves a dynamic selectivity of 15.9 for propylene/propane separation. The development of Na-SAPO-35 adsorbents with high selectivity, substantial adsorption capacity, and robust durability is critical for advancing the industrial implementation of adsorption-based separation technologies.

Indexed as

molecular sievingpore engineeringpropylene/propane separationsilicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve

Identifiers

PMID41369492
PMCPMC12693193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.