ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
From Bench to Use: The Status of Gamma-Shielding Nanomaterials and the Prospects for Lead-Free Wearables.
Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid organic-inorganic CHJournal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
- Fabrication of medical radiation shielding sheets using reactive densification-based tungsten/PE porous composite materials.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Radiation Attenuation Performance of Highly Filled Tungsten/TPU Composites via Anchor-Chain Dispersant-Based Interfacial Design.Polymers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid development of deep-space exploration and crewed missions makes efficient, lightweight, and low-secondary-radiation γ-ray protection in complex cosmic fields a critical materials challenge. Current studies still struggle to simultaneously balance attenuation efficiency, areal density and thickness, flexibility, and shielding against secondary γ rays. Compared with existing reviews that mainly focus on single matrices (especially polymers) or medical lead-based protection, this work targets γ-ray shielding under deep-space and mixed radiation environments, emphasizing multiscale structural designs (multilayer/gradient architectures, micro/nanofiller synergy, and fiber networks) for suppressing secondary γ-rays and outlining composition-structure-morphology-coupled strategies for flexible, wearable, lead-free shields. Recycling and sustainability remain key bottlenecks for practical deployment. Accordingly, this review also summarizes representative Monte Carlo simulation tools and their integration with experiments, and proposes directions for element selection, structural design, and green manufacturing to build design rules and a scale-up roadmap for next-generation lead-free γ-shielding wearables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.