ReviewCells2025
Psychedelics in Multiple Sclerosis: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Prospects for Neuroimmune Modulation and Repair.
Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding the PI3K/Akt/mTOR-JAK/STAT signaling axis in multiple sclerosis: mechanistic crosstalk and therapeutic opportunities.Immunologic research · 2026Review
- Neurorestorative properties of ibogaine: linking multi-receptor affinities to remyelination and metabolic restoration.Acta neuropsychiatrica · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) therapies effectively modulate peripheral immune responses but largely fail to promote neural repair within the central nervous system. This review evaluates whether psychedelic compounds (PSYs), via 5-HT2A activation, can fill a critical therapeutic gap: the need for agents that simultaneously suppress neuroinflammation and promote regeneration. We dissect the evidence suggesting PSYs can reprogram the neuroimmune milieu by downregulating key pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6) in glial cells while concurrently upregulating crucial neurotrophic factors (e.g., BDNF) that promote synaptic plasticity and oligodendrocyte support. However, we argue that the current evidence, largely derived from non-specific inflammation models, is insufficient to predict clinical efficacy in an autoimmune disease like MS. We critically analyze the significant translational barriers-from cardiovascular and psychiatric risks to profound legal and ethical challenges-that temper the immediate clinical promise. Finally, we propose a forward-looking perspective, suggesting that the true value of PSYs may lie not in their direct clinical use, but in uncovering novel therapeutic pathways. The emergence of non-hallucinogenic, functionally selective 5-HT2A agonists, inspired by psychedelic pharmacology, represents a more viable strategy to harness these mechanisms for MS therapy, demanding rigorous preclinical validation in disease-relevant models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.