Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41369346›Full record

ReviewCells2025

Strategies for the Development of NK Cell-Based Therapies for Cancer Treatment.

Tatiana Budagova, Anna Efremova, Margarita Maiak, Dmitry Goldshtein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tatiana BudagovaFederal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Moskvorechye Str. 1, Moscow 115522, Russia.ORCID 0009-0007-3761-3993
Anna EfremovaFederal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Moskvorechye Str. 1, Moscow 115522, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5035-6396
Margarita MaiakFederal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Moskvorechye Str. 1, Moscow 115522, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8048-0769
Dmitry GoldshteinFederal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Moskvorechye Str. 1, Moscow 115522, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2438-1605

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CAR-T cell therapy is a promising method of cancer treatment, but it has some disadvantages. These disadvantages have led scientists to explore the use of safer CAR-NK cells and new genetic modifications in order to improve the effectiveness of CAR cells. In this paper, we analyze existing approaches to modifying CAR-NK cells and discuss the results of clinical trials involving CAR-NK therapies. Conventionally, approaches to NK cell modification can be divided into three main groups: strategies to enhance antitumor cytotoxicity, strategies to improve the survival of CAR-NK cells and prolong their persistence in the body, and strategies to increase the safety of CAR-NK cells. The effects of CAR-NK cells on different tumor types are presented, and the number of clinical trials involving CAR-NK cells has been increasing every year, with positive results so far. As of September 2025, all the trials are in the early 1-2 stages of research, and it is expected that the first CAR-NK product will be approved in the near future.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveKiller Cells, NaturalNeoplasmsAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicHumansReceptors, Chimeric AntigenReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCAR-NKclinical trialshnCD16IL-15/IL-15Rαimmune checkpointssafety switches

Identifiers

PMID41369346
PMCPMC12691322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.