ReviewProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine2026
Sex differences in fall circumstances and injury biomechanics among older adults: A narrative review.
Review in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Predicting Future Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Evidence.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Association between ambient temperature and the risk of hospital admission for injury in South Korea.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Article
- Factors associated with fall prevention-related health literacy practices among community-dwelling older adults in Northern Thailand: a cross-sectional study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Falls are a leading cause of injury and disability among older adults, yet sex-specific differences in fall biomechanics and injury mechanisms remain underexplored. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on how fall circumstances, intrinsic risk factors, and biomechanical responses differ between older males and females. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, with search terms including "fall biomechanics,""sex differences,""older adults," and "injury risk." We screened peer-reviewed studies and included English-language, human-based research that examined sex-specific fall patterns, injury outcomes, and biomechanical factors. Our findings reveal that while males are more likely to fall from seated positions, females more commonly fall while walking and are prone to sideways and backward falls-patterns associated with increased hip and head injuries. In addition, biological differences such as lower injury thresholds, reduced muscle strength, and distinct soft tissue composition further elevate injury risk in females. Despite these differences, most injury models and prevention guidelines remain male-centric or do not consider sex differences. Our findings underscore the need to integrate sex-specific anatomical and functional characteristics into fall prevention strategies and injury prediction models to improve outcomes for both sexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.