Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41369242›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine2025

Nerve injury after total hip arthroplasty: etiology, preventive strategies and medico-legal considerations.

Luca Bianco Prevot, Vittorio Bolcato, Giulia Bambagiotti, Livio Pietro Tronconi, Giuseppe Basile

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luca Bianco PrevotResidency Program in Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Vittorio BolcatoAstolfi Associati Law Firm, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3419-3002
Giulia BambagiottiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, University "Politecnica Delle Marche" of Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
Livio Pietro TronconiDepartment of Health and Life Sciences, European University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6147-3600
Giuseppe BasileDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, University "Politecnica Delle Marche" of Ancona, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9602-4223

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNerve injuries in total hip arthroplasty (THA) are rare but clinically and medico-legally significant adverse events, sometimes severely affecting patients' wellbeing through motor dysfunction and often permanent sensory alterations. Nerve injuries can result from complex interactions between a patient's pathophysiology, the technical aspects of surgery and individual response to surgical trauma - often rendering them not entirely avoidable. Professional liability should be assessed within a comprehensive framework, considering biological and procedural variables, adherence to clinical preventive measures, and proper documentation.

objectiveThis study provides a narrative review of the etiology of nerve injuries and identifies the nerves most frequently affected, with a focus on perioperative actions associated with specific nerve involvement. It also explores the medico-legal implications of post-THA nerve injuries, for an integrated approach to surgical risk management.

resultsNerves more frequently involved during the four phases of the surgical management (preoperative, intraoperative, immediate postoperative and long-term postoperative) are, in order, the sciatic, the femoral, the obturator, the superior gluteal and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerves. Main activities and/or situations associated with the risk of nerve injury, to be prevented or managed properly, are the type of approach, specific intraoperative positioning and timing, surgical technique with ligations, dissections and retractors roles, limb length, local retraction or expansion due to infection, hematoma or cement loss. Therefore, the adverse outcomes should not be automatically interpreted as surgical negligence, especially when standard care and clinical risk management protocols have been followed and documented in clinical records. Thus, distinguishing between unfaulty adverse event and negligence.

conclusionsThe definition of a risk prevention and management strategy for nerve injury represents the first step in patient safety and, consequently, in reducing the likelihood of professional liability claim following THA.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipPeripheral Nerve InjuriesPostoperative ComplicationsHumansLiability, LegalMalpracticeadverse eventsliabilitymedical malpracticemedico-legal implicationsNerve injuriesrisk managementtotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41369242
PMCPMC12697268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.