ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2026
Evaluation of stool-based testing to diagnose tuberculosis in children using the Truenat platform in routine settings in Nigeria.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the Simple One-Step (SOS) stool method for Truenat MTB plus and Xpert MTB/XDR assay.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends testing stool with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert-Ultra) as an initial diagnostic test for detection of tuberculosis (TB) and rifampicin resistance in children. The option of testing stool on the Truenat platform could benefit children and their caregivers in remote areas where GeneXpert is not available. We report the results of research to validate a protocol for processing and testing stool on Truenat using an adapted Simple One Step (SOS) stool method in routine settings in Nigeria. Stool specimens from children with presumptive TB were tested with Truenat MTB Plus (Truenat) and Xpert-Ultra using a comparative cross-sectional study design. A total of 510 children were enrolled and submitted a stool specimen. Of these, 482 (94.5%) had valid results on both platforms, 28 (5.8%) with MTB detected and 454 MTB not detected. Of the 28 with MTB detected, eight were detected on both platforms, seven on Truenat only, and 13 on Xpert-Ultra only. The concordance rate between Truenat and Xpert-Ultra was high at 95.8%. Significantly more non-determinate (error/invalid) results were observed with Truenat compared to Xpert-Ultra (4.7% versus 1.2% respectively;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.