Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41369197›Full record

ReviewmSystems2026

The best from both disciplines: integrating human and microbial signatures from whole genome sequencing to advance cancer diagnostics.

Tina Moser, Matthias J Moser, Alexander Mahnert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mSystems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tina MoserInstitute of Human Genetics, Diagnostic & Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Matthias J MoserInstitute of Human Genetics, Diagnostic & Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Alexander MahnertInstitute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Diagnostic & Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7083-8894

Funding

Medizinische Universität Graz ASO190003011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid biopsies are transforming oncology, enabling earlier diagnosis, dynamic treatment guidance, and personalized precision medicine, yet current approaches focusing mainly on circulating host cell-free DNA (cfDNA) neglect crucial information within co-existing microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA). This review argues for the combined potential of simultaneously analyzing host and microbial signals from samples like blood, specifically focusing on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as the key host component. While ctDNA analysis is already used to guide treatment decisions, the detection of mcfDNA-although present in smaller amounts compared to total cfDNA-offers a distinct and complementary opportunity to identify disease-causing microbes and investigate the host-associated microbiome in the context of cancer. Leveraging machine learning strategies is essential to integrate these multi-view data sets and realize their full potential for enhancing liquid biopsy applications, particularly in early cancer detection.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNANeoplasmsWhole Genome SequencingBiomarkers, TumorEarly Detection of CancerHumansLiquid BiopsyMachine LearningMicrobiotaPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID41369197
PMCPMC12817907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.