ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Utilization Patterns in an Urban Direct Primary Care Model: A Case Study.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDirect Primary Care (DPC) offers an alternative healthcare delivery model with potential benefits for patient-centered care. However, concerns remain about its equity and accessibility, particularly in urban settings. This study examines the utilization patterns and patient engagement within a DPC clinic in Houston, Texas, and whether subscription duration impacts patient-provider interactions in an urban healthcare environment.
methodsDeidentified data from a Houston-based DPC clinic (January 2023-January 2024) were analyzed. Patient demographics, subscription details, and interaction data (including in-person appointments and audio-visual calls) were collected. Descriptive statistics summarized utilization patterns, while logistic regression models assessed relationships between demographic factors and DPC utilization.
resultsThe sample included 71% Non-Hispanic Black patients, 21% Non-Hispanic White, and 77% females. Most patients resided in urban areas (79%) and paid over $125 monthly (44%). Subscription duration positively correlated with engagement: patients subscribed for ≥21 months had higher yearly averages for chart interactions and appointments compared to those who subscribed for ≤5 months. Regression analysis revealed significant dose-response increases in patient engagement among those with longer subscription durations across all interaction types. No other demographic characteristics were significant predictors of DPC utilization.
conclusionSubscription duration strongly influences DPC utilization, suggesting sustained enrollment fosters deeper patient engagement and more frequent provider interactions. While DPC may enhance patient-provider relationships, cost and urban-centric accessibility may pose barriers to equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.