ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Cytokine release syndrome complicated with sepsis induced by tislelizumab in a patient with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: A case of severe hypotension induced by nimotuzumab in a nasopharyngeal carcinoma patient.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we report a 69-year-old female patient with stage IIIB hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who developed sepsis concomitant with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) following treatment with tislelizumab (an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) and subsequently demonstrated self-healing. After receiving tislelizumab-based immunotherapy, the patient presented with severe clinical manifestations, including fever, hypotension, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS); however, after multidisciplinary evaluation regarding the potential risks of immunosuppression, immunosuppressive agents such as tocilizumab or corticosteroids were not applied, and the patient still experienced a good recovery through routine anti-infective therapy and aggressive supportive care. This case highlights the diagnostic complexity in distinguishing CRS from sepsis during anti-tumor immunotherapy and demonstrates that immunomodulatory therapy may not be mandatory in all patients. Collectively, the favorable outcomes achieved without tocilizumab or corticosteroids suggest that selected patients can recover through meticulous clinical monitoring and targeted interventions alone, thus highlighting the clinical importance of selecting patients who can be spared from immunosuppressive therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.